Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Why does history keep changing?

Since I formally began studying history a number of years ago, I have observed that history...or at least the telling of history changes over time. Why so? Well, I think there are several reasons for this.

First, and to state the obvious, history is to a large degree telling the story of something in the past. Duh, you say! But, how we view something of the past is largely due to our own past and present experiences. Things that have happened and are happening in current events effect what historians chose to write about and how they will interpret past events. And since current events are always changing as time marches on, so do the interpretations and perspectives of historians. For example, since 2001 and the beginning of the war on terror, there has been a marked increase in the number of books written on the subject of domestic terrorism, especially concerning terrorism by groups in the Reconstruction years. Another example, although older, is the Civil Rights Movement and the enormous amount of scholarship that it produced on the African American experience in the 1950s, 60s, and 70s...and continues to today.

Secondly, but along the same lines as the above explanation, is that the people writing history change as well. People, such as Indians and African Americans who before the Civil Rights Movement who didn't have the opportunities afforded to them in some locations, later gained those opportunities and were able to learn the art and science of historical research and writing. Another example of this is women's history. The social changes of the 1960s and 1970s brought many women historians into what had largely been a male dominated field and introduced new perspectives and told new stories that had previously been undiscovered (unfortunately, due to lack a of male interest) or ignored (unfortunately, due to a lack of male interest). The gains that have been made in historical scholarship by including minorities' and women's work has been enormous. Some of my favorite history books would have not been written if the people writing the history had not changed in the 20th century.

Thirdly, as time passes, new sources are found. The great "social history" movement that swept historical scholarship since World War II has sought to investigate history through previously undiscovered writing history from the "bottom up." History was once written largely only through limited primary sources; letters, journals, diaries, and newspapers, and of course, secondary sources-what others had already written. But historians not so long ago began to "think outside the box," and by using sources such as estate inventories, court documents, and even oral histories, these historians opened up a world of new information. Locating new information of course changed how we saw events of the past, and only naturally new interpretations developed...and in this way one could say history changed. Revisionism, depending on its context can be both a good thing or a bad thing...but that's another post. People discover and donate new primary documents to archives every day, and of course, previously unavailable documents can shed new light on a historical subject that once seemed closed to additional scholarship.

Lastly, and related to the third, is that the availability of research sources have changed...largely through I mentioned in a previous post. Historians who were once unable to gain access to sources due to limitations in time, or distance, or both, now have ways of getting their hands on them. Secondary source...i.e. historiography research, is now much quicker through technology. Articles can be scanned and emailed; scholarly journals are available online; interlibrary loans are seamlessly processed. All of this makes researching much easier and much less frustrating for the historian, and it allows him or her more time to make critical decisions, and to explore avenues that would not otherwise be considered.

So, there you have reasons why history keeps changing. Hopefully as time goes on we get better in telling the stories of the past and make them more accessible to the public.


  1. Great you have amazing insight this really helps for my paper unlike other people who simply write that history does not change.

  2. this is a very comprehensive analysis and was quite useful for my essay.great job!

  3. impressive, this was helpful to my TOK essay. thanks!

  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

  5. Heard of the Mandela Effect? Time is weird, because we exist in our "own" time, and world. People say that there is now reports of an attack on the statue of liberty by the Germans, but some historians, and students/teachers never even heard about it. My question is, since we have this, and other speculation about things changing around us (Berenstain Bears was Berenstein, but if u look it up it's always been Berenstain) do u think that the past can actually change itself, like our past selves are changing history, or do u remember these always being this way, and nothing has changed? I'm usually not one for conspiracies, but the Mandela Effect is interesting, and most people claim we're in a parallel universe, but it could be people from the future time travelling? I know it's crazy, but I remember Berenstein, not with the a...

  6. Another good post, Tim. I am extremely careful of revisionist history being written today. Much of it being told or written from a view of the modern writer by which the originality of the material can be completely distorted. I, personally, read original material. Rare books, that sort of thing. Written by those who were "there" so to speak. That way I get the real, unrevised, unedited, truth.
    K.B. Morgan

  7. Thank you so much You helped me to do assignment.